by Anonymous
(Florida)
Discharged for using the internet to view and/or download information unrelated to work. The claimantâs actions were not in the employerâs best interests. Benefits not payable.
I have 20-calendar days to file an appeal. My question is, should I file an appeal and if so, on what basis? Although the surveillance of the computer was for approximately 7-10 days, this was the first time I was told it was a violation of City policy. Based on previous rulings, I would think this would not be considered willful misconduct or a careless disregard of the employerâs interest. However, given the choice of receiving previously earned vacation and sick leave or being discharged for cause, which would result in being at the same point of appeal for unemployment benefits, I resigned.
I resigned after I was given the alternative to Resign or be Discharge for Cause, which was the final action by the City that convinced me the City had become a hostile work place.
History leading to resignation:
– A physical violence threat by two council members, one in a public meeting.
– Resignation of the City Attorney, Grants Consultant, Public Works Director, City Administrator, Consulting Recorder, Administrative Secretary.*
– A witnessed 3.5-hour conversation, attempting to intimidate my resignation by another council member who was instrumental in the previous 6-resignations.
– A written reprimand by the interim administrator, his first day on the job, on two incidences that occurred under the previous administrator, which were dropped on legal appeal.
– A written reprimand by the interim administrator, his first week on the job, for being late to work one time under a new policy he instituted, which was dropped on legal appeal.
– A substantial change in working conditions that essentially made me incapable of meeting the unwritten job requirements previously assigned, but no new written job requirements were assigned
– Intimidated by the new City Attorney to resign before they found cause for discharge.
– Verbal charges by the interim administrator, his fourth week on the job, implying use of the internet to view and/or download information unrelated to work, which was obtained by surveillance of an assigned laptop computer that was not based on any written City policy.
– Florida Unemployment determined that the âdischarge was for misconduct connected with workâ
* A regional newspaperâs editorial cartoons document the coerced resignation of the City Administrator by a council member.
Previous use of the laptop computer under the former administrator that was known and/or unknown was not considered to be a violation of City policy. No previous disciplinary actions are on file. No new written or verbal policy was provided by the interim administrator, other than a request not to take the laptop home.
Exerts from City Employee Manual
Intent:
Discharge for cause should seldom be executed without prior warning to the employee. It shall be the policy to provide at least one warning notice to the affected employee unless the specific cause is of a major nature.
Cause:
Disciplinary actions are only to be taken for good and sufficient reasons.
Immediate Suspension:
Department Head may suspend an employee without notice for causes related to personal conduct in order to avoid undue disruption to work, to promote safety of persons or property, or for other serious cause.
Discharge:
An employee may be discharged, when, in the judgment of the Department Head, the employeeâs performance or conduct has given good cause.
Reasons for discharge include, but are not limited to:
– abuse, misuse, or theft of public property, equipment, facilities or supplies.
– violation of departmental rules, personnel* or police regulations, safety rules or City ordinances.
– any employee actions as may be included as defined under Florida Statutes 447.203
*Use of Government Property:
Employees are not allowed to use City property of any kind for any reason.
Comments for Discharged for using the internet to view and/or download information unrelated to work. The claimantâs actions were not in the employerâs best interests. Benefits not payable.in Florida
Average Rating
|
||
|
||
|